A newly identified cloud storage vulnerability termed ‘bucket hijacking’ poses a significant threat to data security. This technique allows hackers to reroute an organization’s cloud data streams, such as audit logs and telemetry, to their own storage locations across various cloud services.
Impacted Cloud Providers
The bucket hijacking method has been verified to affect major providers like Google Cloud, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Microsoft Azure. Each of these platforms has been informed about the vulnerability through responsible disclosure channels.
Although no actual cases of exploitation have been reported, experts warn that if deployed, detecting this attack would be highly challenging. The vulnerability stems from a critical design flaw related to the global uniqueness of cloud storage bucket names.
Mechanics of the Attack
The attack leverages the fact that cloud storage bucket names must be unique globally. This means that the identity of a bucket is tied solely to its name, not to any specific account ownership. Consequently, if an intruder gains access to delete buckets within a cloud environment, they can perform the attack with ease.
By deleting a target’s active storage bucket and swiftly creating a new one with the same name under the attacker’s control, the data streams—whether from Google Cloud logging sinks, AWS S3 replication rules, or Azure Monitor exports—continue to operate unknowingly, directing data to the attacker’s bucket.
Security Implications and Recommendations
This type of attack is particularly insidious because it is self-sustaining. Once completed, the data stream configurations appear intact, not triggering any alerts or errors, allowing data to be siphoned off indefinitely.
Unit 42 carried out successful simulations of this attack on all major cloud platforms, highlighting the risk. They confirmed the method on Google Cloud Logging sinks, AWS S3 bucket replication, and Azure Monitor diagnostic settings.
To mitigate this threat, experts recommend implementing stringent access controls and continuous monitoring. Specifically, they advise restricting deletion permissions to essential administrative roles, enforcing data perimeter controls, and enabling account-specific bucket naming on AWS to prevent hijacking.
Broader Implications and Future Outlook
Researchers emphasize that this vulnerability is not confined to the tested providers; any cloud service with globally unique, static storage identifiers could be at risk. This revelation underscores the need for robust security strategies across multi-cloud environments.
As shared architectural principles among cloud providers can lead to similar vulnerabilities, security teams must remain vigilant. Ongoing research and proactive defense measures are crucial in safeguarding cloud infrastructures against evolving threats.
For a comprehensive list of features to enhance security operations, download the 2026 AI SOC Features Checklist.
